-
Website
http://www.marketfolly.com/ -
Original page
http://www.marketfolly.com/2008/04/about-marketfollycom-contact-us.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Tom Chechatka
6 comments · 3 points
-
PeterD
40 comments · 1 points
-
rower32
8 comments · 1 points
-
McLarty
3 comments · 17 points
-
bayas2tcnj
10 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Hedge Fund Exposure Levels: Still Very Long Equities
9 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Seth Klarman's Baupost Group Sells More Syneron Medical (ELOS)
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
Balyasny Asset Management Filed 13G On Maguire Properties (MPG)
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
Market Folly Custom Portfolio: November 2009 Performance
1 week ago · 14 comments
-
Ten Investment Themes For 2010
2 days ago · 3 comments
-
Hedge Fund Exposure Levels: Still Very Long Equities
But, yes, to park USO for the long term would give you exposure to peak oil theory and its one of the few ways to play the commodity of crude somewhat directly. None of the ETFs to play crude are "ideal" for holding long-term. But, as a retail investor, you're limited to those options and so you've got to pick and choose. There are other options (OIL, DBO, etc) but each vehicle has its positives and negatives.
Any thoughts on how I can find straight forward, easy to understand "basic" Option trading information.
PS, this site is great !
Thanks
I'd like to also recommend three books: "Options and Options Trading: A Simplified Course That Takes You From Coin Tosses to the Black-Scholes" by Robert W. Ward; "Options: Trading Strategy and Risk Management" by Simon Vine, and an intermediate/advanced book: "Options as a Strategic Investment" by Lawrence G. McMillan.
Once you're done with the first two books (and only then!) visit Charles Cottle's excellent website www.riskdoctor.com.
Good luck!
Best,
PeterD
Did I work on your back at an airport in Guatemala, after a hurricane, Oct. 24, 2005? Mike
Are we permitted to discuss our investment picks? I am asking because since I first discovered marketfolly, I've been closely following Soros's portfolio and I've made a stock purchase lately that ties in well with Soros's increased interest in a certain sector. If Soros had not heavily increase his position in said sector I've would not have considered the purchase. I don't want to discuss the purchase per se; instead, I would like to discuss my reasoning behind such a purchase. I find it kind of exciting and would like to share it with others. And btw, my purchase was small so I am not sweating it, especially with this crazy market of late,
~PeterD
I look forward to the feedback,
~Peter
Also, I'm based in Dallas, are you as well?
Have you heard of the American futurist, inventor, scientist, and "world leader in pattern recognition techniques" Raymond Kurzweil? He's quite the amazing fellow. This guy makes quants look like high school dropouts. I think you'll find his website, http://www.fatkat.com/index.html, quite interesting, Jay.
"fat" by the way, is an acronym for "financial accelerating transactions"
Here's the company's overview from his site (sorry, it's past midnight and I'm a little tired to summarize it):
"Company Overview
Quant investing is a significant phenomenon. It is applied today to an estimated trillion dollars of market funds. In the near future, Quant technique are expected to play a major role across the broad scope of capital markets (a 20 trillion dollar arena).
FatKat's goal is to combine the best in financial knowledge with the best in mathematics and computer science to create a self-sustaining Quant system. Pattern recognition techniques (the hallmark technology of Ray Kurzweil firms) play a central role in finding predictability in the markets of today and the future. Our proprietary techniques are geared to find predictability wherever it exists, and to maintain that advantage in an automated fashion. We believe that the FatKat technology adds a unique dimension to the field of quantitative investment."
~PeterD
Math whiz. If there's a wild card in this investing arms race, it may be FatKat. The company may sound like a villain in a James Bond flick, but it's really a fledgling investment firm in Wellesley, Mass., founded by inventor and AI evangelist Ray Kurzweil. Although he's currently mum on FatKat, Kurzweil has written about the potential of mathematical formulas known as genetic algorithms to beat the market. The Darwinist process would begin with software randomly generating a million sets of rules for buying and selling stocks. Each set is a financial organism with the rules constituting its DNA. The ones that can't beat the market are killed, while the stock-savvy survivors mutate and breed until the population is back to a million. Rinse and repeat 100,000 times. "The surviving software creatures should be darn smart investors," he writes in The Age of Spiritual Machines.
How smart might AI programs get? By the year 2050, perhaps, investment software programs may be able to "come up with their own investment hypotheses, test them out, and implement them," says Andrew Lo, director of MIT's Laboratory for Financial Engineering. For now, though, humans still have a big role to play in the AI investment process. While the numbers are being crunched, the world keeps spinning and you need humans to keep track of it. At AIT, it takes all weekend to download data and update investment models. You also need humans to monitor the world for events that aren't reflected immediately in the data, such as terrorist attacks. And what happens if supersmart computers eventually get so good at the prediction game that all investors are made of silicon rather than carbon? Then the computers, as Kurzweil puts it, "will be trying to outpredict each other."
Sophisticated computer programs take the human element out of picking winners on Wall Street
Intriguing stuff to say the least.
Ray Kurzweil is an extraordinarily fascinating man. When you get the chance, read up about him in wikipedia and you'll see that the adverb "extraordinarily," if anything, is an understatement! And I kid you not when I say that Kurzweil is hoping and working for the day when he would be able to upload his brain to some sort of supercomputer and achieve---you're not going to believe this---immortality.
No, Jay I haven't been reasearching them. The reasons are twofold: First, I am a newbie when it comes to hedge funds, quant funds, and what have you---besides, I wouldn't know what to ask. Second, I've noticed that FatKat has a contact e-mail, and... well, I was kind of hoping you would contact them. You're not shy, are you? ;)
Cheers,
~PeterD
I just wanted to bring to everyone's attention an interesting essay I just read in the London Review of Books about the banking crisis(who says it went away). It's by John Lanchester, titled "It's Finished." Here is the link: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n10/lanc01_.html
It is well worth the read.
Here's the first paragraph:
It’s a moment of confusion and loathing that most of us have experienced. You’re in a shop. It’s time to pay. You reach for your purse or wallet and take out your last note. Something about it doesn’t feel quite right. It’s the wrong shape or the wrong colour and the design is odd too and the note just doesn’t seem right and . . . By now you’ve realised: oh shit! It’s the dreaded Scottish banknote! Tentatively, shyly – or briskly, brazenly, according to character – you proffer the note. One of three things then happens. If you’re lucky, the tradesperson takes the note without demur. Unusual, but it does sometimes happen. If you’re less lucky, he or she takes the note with all the good grace of someone accepting delivery of a four-week-dead haddock. If you’re less lucky still, he or she will flatly refuse your money. And here’s the really annoying part: he or she would be well within his or her rights, because Scottish banknotes are not legal tender. ‘Legal tender’ is defined as any financial instrument which cannot be refused in settlement of a debt. Bank of England notes are legal tender in England and Wales, and Bank of England coins are legal tender throughout the UK, but no paper currency is. The bizarre fact of the matter is that Scottish banknotes are promissory notes, with the same legal status as cheques and debit cards.
~PeterD
For instance, Baupost Group is ran by Seth Klarman and is one of the most respected value investors of all time. In this regard, we would argue that his performance speaks for itself on a lengthy track record of years and years of double digit returns. Sure, past performance is no indication of future results, but the fact that he was able to keep a vast majority of his portfolio in cash throughout the crisis speaks for itself. Additionally, he has slowly started to deploy cash into this market turmoil as it plays right into his value bent.
Secondly, our selection of Eton Park plays right into a combination of merger arbitrage and stockpicking strategies. Mindich's fund is quite young (inception in 2004) and we are of the belief that newer, younger managers are driven and are hungry to generate performance track records of their own. Lastly, by focusing on Shumway, we focus on a pure stockpicker. His inception was also somewhat recent (2003/04). We have seen his talent through his time at Tiger Management and now at his own firm. This provides us with a fundamental bent in our portfolio. While one could argue that Baupost and Shumway are both value players, we are focused more on their ability to pick stocks and identify solid companies/trends with longer term timeframes. As such, they aren't as concerned with month to month performance, but more so the year by year metrics. And, their performance illustrates this.
Hopefully this clarifies and please let us know if you have any other questions or comments in this regard. You bring up a good point regarding survivorship bias and selecting portfolios predicated on past performance. Let me be clear that this is not what we have done. Like I said earlier, I've created portfolios on Alphaclone that have even better performance but I did not select them as the MF clone because I was searching for a clone that would perform well going forward due to deep analysis of the manager, their investment style/methodology, and their investment time frame.
Looking at results is not the only thing here. We have focused on so much more as we have been studying hedge funds and tracking them for many years now.
This is misleading foolish amateurs into thinking great hedge funds run far more concentrated portfolio than they do.
The best estimate might be to take the % you derive and divide by 2 (estimating for effects of gross exposure, non-13F securities like international stocks, etc).
As of 31-August-2009, the largest disclosed long positions in our investment portfolio are Arkema, Criteria Caixa Corp, Ford Motor Company debt, gold, Lanxess and Pfizer.
formance results and largest holdings are listed on the website.
In addition to your sector ETFs make sure you get some commodity exposure somehow too, to diversify into other asset classes outside of the typical stocks and bonds. Thanks again for the kind words.
Oh and keep in mind that this is not investment advice, purely for information or educational purposes :)