-
Website
http://www.marketfolly.com/ -
Original page
http://www.marketfolly.com/2009/02/hedge-fund-portfolio-tracking-q4-2008.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Tom Chechatka
6 comments · 3 points
-
PeterD
40 comments · 1 points
-
rower32
8 comments · 1 points
-
McLarty
3 comments · 17 points
-
bayas2tcnj
10 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Hedge Fund Exposure Levels: Still Very Long Equities
9 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Seth Klarman's Baupost Group Sells More Syneron Medical (ELOS)
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
Balyasny Asset Management Filed 13G On Maguire Properties (MPG)
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
Market Folly Custom Portfolio: November 2009 Performance
1 week ago · 14 comments
-
Ten Investment Themes For 2010
2 days ago · 3 comments
-
Hedge Fund Exposure Levels: Still Very Long Equities
Thanks,
Fred
and you can always pull up the full filing with the SEC if you want to see all the moves before we cover them
If you are familiar with gurufocus.com, I would kindly appreciate your thoughts on this website. And how would it compare to say Alphaclone? I am asking because I was considering subscribing to gurufocus until I serendipitously stumbled onto your site and then (via your wonderful site) to Alphaclone's site. If there is a lot of overlap between the sites, there is no need to subscribe to both is what I'm getting at.
Thank you.
Best,
PeterD
The 13F filings show the quarterly holdings and so anything in between those disclosures would be due to 13D filings (ownership of more than 5% of a company & activist intentions), a 13G filing (ownership of more than 5% but a passive stake), or Form 4 (which shows large sales and purchases of large holders). They have to file those right when they make such a large transaction. Tracking hedge funds is what I do, so I've been very anal about it and compared it all by hand to all the sites out there. Personally, I'm not a big fan of Gurufocus just because they occasionally have some calculation errors or data upload errors. And, same can be said for a lot of other sites.
So, to answer your question, I'm obviously biased towards Alphaclone since I use it every single day and know its accurate. Not to mention, they let you clone groups of funds (i.e. combining a bunch of hedge fund portfolios into one single portfolio). In addition to seeing and cloning the positions of a single hedge fund, you can customize so many things that the possibilities are quite extraordinary.
Definitely no need to subscribe to both. I'd say Alphaclone is superior solely due to the amount of things you can customize. Check it out and if you don't like it, then go to Gurufocus. But, I'm pretty sure you won't be doing that after you really get into the possibilities with AlphaClone.
And, on that note, tomorrow morning (4/9) I have a post coming that shows you some more of the possibilities with Alphaclone so I'd suggest you check that out tomorrow morning.
Thanks again for the comment.
~Jay
Once again, I am very fortunate to have discovered your site. You should be receiving my donation to your site any minute now.
Best,
PeterD
Canada
P.S. There's a great Jan. 2008 article in bloomberg.com (www.bloomberg.com/news/marketsmag/mm_0108_story...) on James Simons and his Renaissance HF. I did not know this but all the people working at R are scientists. Simons shys away from the MBA types. Simons "blames the herdlike mentality among business school graduates for poor investor returns." Truly a must read.
Also, thanks for bringing the Rentec article to my attention again. I had read that when it was initially published and have included it in today's "What We're Reading" post with a hat tip to you for bringing it to my attention again. It's a good piece and very relevant, considering we just looked at Rentec's positions the other day.
Thanks,
Fred