<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Market Folly - Latest Comments in Technical Analysis: Charts With Solid Risk/Reward</title><link>http://marketfolly.disqus.com/</link><description>Updates on what top hedge funds have been buying and selling.  SEC Filings, hedge fund letters, investment conferences and more.</description><atom:link href="https://marketfolly.disqus.com/technical_analysis_charts_with_solid_riskreward/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:49:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Technical Analysis: Charts With Solid Risk/Reward</title><link>http://www.marketfolly.com/2008/09/technical-analysis-charts-with-solid.html#comment-7389359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well, technically we were looking for 660 first... but we never actually hit that, we hit 667 or so.  so yes, 660 was the initial target but 600 was the ideal downside target based on a confluence of earnings multiples down there, technical support, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marketfolly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technical Analysis: Charts With Solid Risk/Reward</title><link>http://www.marketfolly.com/2008/09/technical-analysis-charts-with-solid.html#comment-7388727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Likewise, if we breakdown completely, the bottom of the wedge would be at around 600.’ - So the only way to confirm a downside move is if goes below 600? Seems kind of far. Should’nt be 50% of the move?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hypnosis.course</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technical Analysis: Charts With Solid Risk/Reward</title><link>http://www.marketfolly.com/2008/09/technical-analysis-charts-with-solid.html#comment-3966288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not a mistake and you don't owe anyone an apology. You're doing a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ffxi gil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>